Crime and Punishment Essay

Published: 2020-04-22 15:24:05
728 words
3 pages
printer Print
essay essay

Category: Literature

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

The meaning of Notes from Underground to the artistic world is difficult to overestimate. As mentioned by L. P. Grosman: Notes from Underground is one of the most exposing compositions of Dostoyevsky. Never has it happened again that he opens up in such fullness all of his most intimate thoughts, not meant for show secrets of his heart (Grosman, 299). Becoming the prelude to other great works of Dostoyevsky, Notes from Underground influenced world literature, not only Russian literary growth.

Merezhkovskii thought that the main difference between Dostoyevskys and Nietzsches last freedoms is that Dostoyevsky, growing underground ideas in his characters, but not completing them still tried to grasp onto Russian orthodoxy, while the other praised the man: Just as Nietzsche [¦] Dostoyevsky considers the last gift of freedom to be the man-god, the antichrist, with the difference in the two being that Nietzsche blesses this gift, and Dostoyevsky curses it (Merezhkovskii, 217 218).

By the thoughts of Berdyaev, if before Notes from Underground Dostoyevsky was no more than a: humanist, full of compassion for the poor people, the humiliated and insulted, the characters of the House of the Dead, then from Notes from Underground begins the brilliant ideological dialectic of Dostoyevsky. He is no longer simply a psychologist, he is a metaphysician; he explores, to the depths, the tragedies of human spirit. He is no longer a humanist by the old meaning of the word; He has completely torn away from Belinskys humanism. (Berdyaev, 36).

At the same time Berdyaev did not share this opinion with Shestov about Dostoyevsky being an exclusive underground psychologist: Dostoyevsky possesses underground psychology only in the moment of the spiritual journey of man. He does not leave us in the hopeless circle of underground psychology, he removes us from it (Berdyaev, 141). Losing humanistic faith in man, Dostoyevsky has no choice but to be loyal to the Christian principles, deepening, strengthening and enriching them; therefore, he cannot be a gloom, hopelessly-pessimistic writer.

In his darkest and most painful moments Dostoyevsky has the light of Christ the freeing light (37). Notes from Underground was praised as one of the most reaction producing stories by Yermylov, where-in was conducted not only malicious controversy with the novel of a genius Russian revolutionary-democrat NG Chernyshevsky, but also told about moral crimes. Thus in the face of the conscience of mankind Dostoyevskys role in moral crime proved heavy because you cannot talk about the crime with malice! (Yermylov, 42 43).

Exploring the works of the 1860s, in particular the novel Notes from Underground, Kirpotin concluded about the importance of its poetics for all following works of Dostoyevsky and specific to his novel form: The poetics of Notes from Underground contains within it undeveloped poetics from the later works of Dostoyevsky. The merging of philosophy and narration in Notes from Underground, and its dissolution in the story soon after [¦] led to the creation of the first great novel by Dostoyevsky Crime and Punishment, a new novel which was specific to Dostoyevskys type.

(Kirpotin, 472, 475) The genius of Dostoyevsky in Notes from Underground is expressed in that he felt, and strongly expressed the psychology of philosophical experience. Demonstrating how ones character forms or deforms under heavy influence, he was able to show the crystallization of the human spirit; this concept has gained world renowned meaning. Separating Dostoyevsky from his character and considering Notes from Underground as a complete work of art and nothing less, Kirpotin admitted the truth expressed in the story about the authors vision, retaining its aesthetic nature.

However, through aesthetics Dostoyevsky peered into anthology, into the philosophy of the world, into space and society, but stated Kirpotin as he understood them, of course (Kirpotin, 175). Understanding the writer, according to Kirpotin was inadequate for the ideas of the advanced people in society; Dostoyevsky kept to his ingenious artistic discoveries despite his beliefs.

Prospective studies carried out under the archetypal approach in the study of the underground image help find the answers to a number of important questions about this work: on the true place of the man from the underground in Dostoyevskys work, on the expressive or un-expressive characteristics in all its characters and on the means of poetic incarnation of the underground phenomenon, on the influence of the image of an underground hero on the classic works of world literature, which spawned a whole gallery of underground characters.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read