Marius and I are different in the way he analyzes his first draft after printing it out. For example, in his article he suggest that we print out what we have written so far, get up from where we are sitting, sit somewhere else and read it. Then before bedtime re-read it so that we can subconsciously organize and create ideas while we sleep so that in the morning we wake up to possibly discovering new ideas. On the other hand, when I worked on my history assignment I did not do what Marius suggested. Instead I printed out my first draft and took it to my teacher so that she can read it and give me feedback on what she thinks I need to work on in order to have a more developed paper.
However, Marius and I are similar in the way we brainstorm ideas. In his article he suggests to write down a list on topics and ideas that we would like to cover in the essay, not really focusing on the order of importance of ideas but just to get ideas flowing and that is exactly what I do before I begin writing my first draft. I think about my main subject and I branch off different sub topics by writing a list of points I want to address in my paper. This method helps me on the development of ideas for my paper and I find it really effective.
In addition we are both similar when developing the second draft because we both are willing to make radical changes. For instance, Marius advises not to hesitate in changing the second draft if you have come up with new ideas. In his article Marius states, If your thesis changed while you were writing your first draft, you will base your second draft on this new subject (Marius 92). Changing a thesis in an essay is a very radical move when writing because that means you have to re-evaluate the whole essay in order for it to connect with your thesis.
Similarly, when I worked on the second draft of my history assignment in addition to editing the few things my teacher had suggested after showing her my first draft, I made very big changes to my paper. I completely changed my thesis and cut out unnecessary subjects that I had wrote in my first draft. By doing this it helped me to expand my thought process on my history assignment and I was able to add a vast amount of information to my paper.
Lastly, Marius and I are similar in the way we focus on the overall level of editing while proofreading our third drafts. For instance, Marius says, In your third draft, you can sharpen sentences, add information here and there, cut some things, and attend to other details to heighten the force of your writing (Marius 92). Likewise, during the third draft of my history assignment I also focused on sharpening sentences by checking for grammar and spelling errors to polish my paper. Adding minimal information and cutting back on some unnecessary thoughts added more focus on my subject so the reader wouldnt get bored or irritated with random rambling and attending to details to heighten my force of writing helped to add depth and understanding. This really helped my paper come together in a more formal way because now I had a paper that is fully developed.
In conclusion, even though there were some differences in the way Marius and I analyzed our first draft in our essays we were still similar on how we brainstormed ideas. In the second draft we both made radical changes to help add more vast information and in our third draft we both like to focus more on the overall editing while proofreading to polish our paper completely. I believe that Marius processes of developing an essay are excellent examples to follow when writing an essay but at the same time we should not be afraid to do things differently. Everyone has their own ways of doing things and writing is certainly not something that should have a set step by step process.
Marius, Richard. Writing Drafts. 75 Readings Plus. Tenth ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2013. 91-93. Print.