(Boeree, 1998) Skinners view of human nature is considered problematic by most rationalists for the simple fact that it reduces it to a series of conditioned behaviors ” an empirically sequenced string of if-then actions ” that coldly implies the irrelevance of higher reasoning to explain them. (Boeree, 1998) As such, any moral rationalization of human behavior is merely post hoc reasoning. Nonetheless, it is difficult to reconcile Skinners model of human behavior with determinism.
While determinism holds that every event creates a fixed result , Skinner holds that every event (i.e. human behavior) is maintained only by the properties of a reinforcer (Newall, 2005; Boeree, 2006). This creates a small but significant contradiction because the question of how a reinforcer shapes human behavior becomes moot when said reinforcer is also pre-determined.
References Boeree, C. George (1998). B. F. Skinner. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://webspace. ship. edu/cgboear/skinner. html Newall, P. (2005) Free Will and Determinism. Retrieved February 29, 2008, from http://www. galilean-library. org/int13. html.