A generalization surfaced that Muslims must ALL be terrorists. As airport security was advanced in many countries, Muslims, men and women wearing religious clothing were said to have been under greater scrutiny compared to other travellers because of their religion. This type of generalization is unfair and discriminatory to the innocent Muslims, especially women and children who themselves suffer at the hands of extremist groups such as the Taliban in Afghanistan. Indigenous Australians are often portrayed as alcoholics. Although it is true that there are Indigenous Australians out there that are alcoholics, so too can be said for non-indigenous Australians. Most people that would make such a generalization probably dont have factual evidence or any statistics to back up their belief.
Thus this generalisation exists because it is easier to characterize indigenous Australians based on their similarities such as features and skin colour, than it is non-indigenous Australians. The same way that Muslims are characterized by their choice of clothing. In making such assumptions people fail to consider successful Indigenous Australians such as athlete Cathy Freeman, or musician Christina Anu, whom would take great offence to such statements made about their people.
Generalizations can be deeply hurtful, especially to the Indigenous Australians who were introduced to alcohol by British settlers that came and disturbed their peace. People pass judgment that they otherwise wouldnt if it werent for existing generalisation. It is the idea that ethnic or religious groups are automatically assumed as guilty until proven innocent. That is, they are ALL terrorists or alcoholics for example until that individual proves otherwise. This train of thought is dangerous as it is unfair and unjust for people to face discrimination based on generalizations.